• Home
  • About us
  • Modules
  • Basic knowledge
  • Body parts
  • Interventional radiology
  • Subscribe
  • Favourites
    Module

    Ionizing Radiation

    Practical information about ionizing radiation produced by X-ray and CT examinations.

    Ionizing Radiation
    Radiology Expert
    add to favourites

    Harmful effects of radiation

    Two harmful effects are distinguished:

    1. Deterministic effects; the likelihood and severity of the effects are dose-dependent. From a certain threshold dose, the body is no longer able to repair the radiation-induced cellular damage; think of red skin after prolonged radioscopy.  Under the threshold dose, no effect occurs; above the threshold dose the severity of the effect increases with the radiation dose.
      These are effects in the short term after high radiation dose. 
    2. Stochastic (risk-bound) effects; the likelihood of these effects occurring depends on the dose. The higher the exposure, the higher the risk that the effect will occur. There is no threshold dose.
      These are potential effects in the long term after exposure to a low dose. All radiation to which someone is exposed in his/her life is added up. This can be compared with the concept of number of pack-years in smokers.

    The primary radiation risk is the development of cancer.
    Much is known about the effect of acute high radiation doses (cancer, red skin, hair loss etc).  Think particularly of examinations related to the nuclear bomb explosions in Hiroshima & Nagasaki in Japan. 
    Unfortunately, we still have much to learn about the long-term risks following exposure to low-dose radiation. In addition to environmental factors that have their impact, it takes several decades for cancer to develop (long incubation time). What it comes down to is that it is difficult to distinguish 'spontaneously’ developed tumors from tumors resulting from exposure to low-dose radiation. 

    IRCP estimate the risk of radiation-induced cancer in low dose and low dose rate at 5.5% per Sv
    So this is 0.0055% per mSv (1 Sv = 1000 mSv).

    For your reference, some data:

    • The mean dose for CT tests varies from 2 – 20 mSv.
    • General ‘basic risk’: +- 1 in 6 women will develop breast cancer at some point in their lives (= 16.7%). 
    • Death risk due to smoking is 0.005% per 100 cigarettes.  One could say that the risk of 1 cigarette about equals 0.01 mSv. If someone smokes 2000 cigarettes a year (= about 2 packs/week), this will 'expose’ this person to 20 mSv annually.  

    In view of the uncertain long-term effects of radiation, rules have been formulated in the Netherlands:

    • Per capita dose limit:  1 mSv per year (above the natural background radiation). 
    • Dose limit at hospital site perimeter:  < 0.1 mSv annually.
    • Dose limit for radiology worker:   20 mSv annually (calculation: 30 working years = 600 mSv = 0.6 Sv). 

    Note: there is no official dose limit for radiation in medical diagnostics (radiology and nuclear medicine) and medical treatment (intervention radiology, radiotherapy and nuclear medicine). 

    Primary risk groups include pilots (cosmic radiation), intervention radiologists/intervention cardiologists and professions in industrial applications such as isotope production.  Using personal dosimeters (fig. 2), information is obtained on professional exposure to ionizing radiation. This is documented in the National Dose Registration and Information System (NDRIS).

    Children

    Children are more sensitive to radiation than adults. This is because children have many replicating cells. Consequently, DNA errors and/or changes may occur relatively more frequently, which could lead to the development of cancer. Additionally, the child has more time to develop cancer (long incubation time!) compared to someone of 70 years old. 
    A correct indication is essential to minimize the child's radiation burden.  In each X-ray/CT test, it must be considered whether the question cannot be answered using an imaging technique without ionizing radiation (such as ultrasound or MRI).

    Interested?

    Learn everything about Ionizing Radiation

    Buy a single module for €2,50 or all modules for €25 per year.
    Literature: sources and author

    Text & Illustrations

    drs. A. van der Plas, MSK radiologist Maastricht UMC+
     
    Sources:

    • United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation (2008)
    • Bethesda. MD. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. 2009,  NCRP No. 160.
    • Padole A, Ali Khawaja RD et al. CT Radiation Dose and Iterative Reconstruction Techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (2015)
    • Mettler FA Jr, Huda W et al. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology (2008)
    • Brenner DJ, Elliston CD et al. Estimated Risks of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (2001)
    • M. Prokop; Spiral and Multislice Computed Tomography of the body (2003)
    • Ghiassi-nejadd M, Mortazavi SM et al. Very high background radiation areas of Ramsar Iran: preliminary biological studies. Health Phys. (2002)
    • RIVM – Dossier Stralingsbelasting in Nederland.
    • Rehani MM. Am Confused About the Cancer Risks Associated With CT: How Can We Summarize What Is Currently Known? AJR Am J Roentgenol. (2015)
    • Kleinman PL, Strauss KJ et al. Patient Size Measured on CT Images as a Function of Age at a Tertiary Care Children’s Hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (2010)
    • Gezondheidsraad. Risico’s van blootstelling aan ioniserende straling. Den Haag: Gezondheidsraad, 2007 (publicatienr. 2007/03)
    • Aliyu AS, Ramli AT. The world’s high background natural radiation areas (HBNRAs) revisited: A broad overview of the dosimetric, epidemiological and radiobiological issues. Radiation Measurements (2015)
    • Gordic S, Morsbach F et al. Ultralow-dose chest computed tomography for pulmonary nodule detection: first performance evaluation of single energy scanning with spectral shaping. Invest Radiol. (2014)
    • Kleiverda G, van Tienhoven G. Bestraling tijdens de zwangerschap: denk nooit nooit. Ned Tijdschr Oncol (2007)
    • Berlin SC, Weinert DM et al. Successful Dose Reduction Using Reduced Tube Voltage With Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction in Pediatric Abdominal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (2015)
    • Mahesh M. NCRP Report Number 160: its significance to medical imaging. J Am Coll Radiol. (2009)
    • Bethesda, Md. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2009)
    • Cira-Bielac O, Rehani MM et al. Risk for radiation-induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: is there reason for concern? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. (2010)
    • Rajabi AB, Noohi F et al. Ionizing Radiation-Induced Cataract in Interventional Cardiology Staff. Res Cardiovasc Med. (2015)

    23/08/2015

    (All the work (text, illustrations, visual elements) seen on this website is copyright by Radiology Expert.
    It may not be used without written permission of Radiology Expert).